|
The "Left Behind" series by Tim
LaHaye is thoroughly trashed and hated by the Catholic
apologist. Biblical teaching about the Pre-Tribulation Rapture,
the Great Tribulation of seven years, and the Millennial Reign
of Jesus Christ all flies directly against the Catholic
revisions of Scripture. Of course, there are some variations of
teaching about the Rapture and the Millennium in our midst, and
Catholic writers make much out of those differences. What they
fail to do is explain the many variations of doctrine in their
own camp about Scripture and major truths.
The Catholic view of both the
political world and the church is that of a dictatorship rather
than a democracy. They brag about their One World views and
international monopoly of their contingencies, but their
dictatorial and dogmatic approach has always squashed any
private views or open debate. Look at any culture dominated by
its hierarchy and there are limited human rights, almost
non-existent private enterprise that creates great wealth, and
very depressed personal freedoms. Let's especially look at their
condemnation of the Rapture and then at their doctrines of End
Time prophecy.
"The Rapture Trap": A Catholic
Attack
I have two books from the Catholic bookstore that attack the
Rapture with a fury. Both are written by disenchanted
Evangelicals who have turned Catholic. The first book is The
Rapture Trap by Paul Thigpen.
Let me quote Marcus C. Grodi,
another Evangelical who has turned Catholic, from his forward to
Mr. Thigpen's book. He described his background among the
Evangelical world. This is the forward he wrote for The Rapture
Trap.
"In the mid-seventies, an
engineering student I know experienced a powerful, life-changing
adult re-conversion to Christ. He was 'born again,' in the
popular language of evangelical Protestantism, and he grew
intent on loving and serving the Lord as completely as he could.
Not long afterwards, a friend, anxious to share a book that had
shaken his own life to the roots, passed along a copy of The
Late Great Planet Earth, a book of apocalyptic speculations by
the Protestant fundamentalist writer Hal Lindsey.
"Unable to put the book down, the
young man, now working as a plastics engineer, read it from
cover to cover. Without adequate religious training to challenge
the book's premises, and trusting in his friend's sincerity, he
accepted the book's teaching, hook, line, and 'rapture.'
"In time, the book's emphasis on the
notion of a 'rapture'-- and imminent 'secret' coming of
Christ--led the young man to question his vocation: 'If Jesus
were to return tonight, would He be pleased with what I'm doing
with my life? Would I be content to tell Him that I'm dedicating
my life to making better plastic cups, butter tubs, and coffee
decanters?' Eventually this was one reason that the engineer
decided to leave his secular career and enter the seminary
instead.
"In case you haven't guessed, I was
that young man, and for several years I was caught up in the
apocalyptic views expressed in books such as Hal Lindsey's
little volume and more recent 'Left Behind' series. During my
years of study at an evangelical seminary, I was confronted with
every Protestant 'end times' notion imaginable. Often during
theology classes, or especially around the dinner table,
seminarians would debate over the details, the timing, and the
imminence of Christ's return.
"Sometimes contradicting views would
split us along denominational lines. (The majority of mainline
Protestants actually do not believe in the secret rapture.) Too
often these debates led to unchristian anger. I must even admit,
shamefaced, that I once lost a close friendship because my
friend and I could not see eye-to-eye about whether the timing
of Christ's second coming was preordained or whether it was
dependent upon man's free will in his efforts to reform the
world.
"I encountered again these same
issues constantly during my years as a Protestant minister. In
every congregation I served, some member or members would
challenge the longterm planning of the church because the
rapture of true believers, snatching them out of the world into
heaven, was to occur any minute. 'Forget tomorrow!' they
insisted. 'We must insure that all are ready to meet their Maker
tonight!'" (The Rapture Trap, by Paul Thigpen, Ph.D. Published
by Ascension Press, pp. 11-12.)
Please forgive the long quote but
this helps you understand why the Catholics are promoting this
book big time. It's impossible to believe in the Pre-Tribulational
Rapture and still be a Catholic. Their entire worldview makes
the Rapture anathema to them. The introduction in this book is
entitled, "The Truth Will Set You Free". A few quotes will give
you their basic argument against the Rapture. Thigpen said,
"Sadly enough, a mistaken and rather novel idea about Christ's
return, rooted in fundamentalist Protestant teaching, is making
the rounds of our culture these days. It claims that Jesus is
coming back, not once more, but twice. One of those times, this
teaching asserts, He will come secretly to snatch away true
believers from their troubles on earth. This even has been
dubbed the 'rapture' (or 'secret rapture'), from a Latin verb
that means 'caught up' or 'snatched.'
"If you are Catholic, when Jesus
comes, many of the preachers of this idea insist, you had better
be careful. If you have failed to renounce some of the essential
beliefs the Church has taught you, too bad. You are not a true
Christian. You will be left behind.
"That claim is simply not true. It
is a dangerous error. And that is why this book was written. In
recent days many unsuspecting Catholics have gotten caught in
the 'rapture trap.' I want to help them get free of this
unbiblical idea and the anti-Catholic theology to which it is
typically shackled. I want to warn other Catholics who might be
in danger of getting ensnared. And I hope to help equip Catholic
pastors and teachers to dismantle the trap whenever they
encounter it." (Ibid., p. 19.)
Please note in the following quote
that the basic argument against the Rapture is church dogma and
not the Word of God. They simply do not argue from scripture but
from the dictates of previous popes. He further stated, "'The
Rapture Trap' is written primarily, then, for everyday Catholics
who accept the God-given teaching authority of the Church and
who have a good dose of common sense. They will find here ample
grounds for rejecting the rapture teaching as misguided and
alien to both Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition. I trust
they will also discover much more in these pages: an overview of
Catholic teaching on the 'close of the age' (Matthew 24:3;
28:20); some insights for responding to other questionable
claims about the end times; and encouragement to grow
spiritually strong in the rich soil of the Catholic faith."
(Ibid., p. 20.)
Note that he calls the teaching of
this church, "the rich soil of the Catholic faith".
Author Thigpen states, "'The Rapture Trap' is written primarily,
then, for everyday Catholics who accept the Godgiven teaching
authority of the Church and who have a good dose of common
sense." (Ibid.) Read this statement from his book, "All the
tedious and prickly debates over the true meaning of a biblical
Greek term used by St. Paul, or over the true significance of a
horned beast pictured in the book of Revelation, really count
for very little until this larger issue of authority is
resolved, some of these minor debates may count for nothing at
all." (Ibid., p. 21.)
The question is the authority of the
Catholic Church to teach doctrines, above and contrary to the
Bible. This author closes his introduction of this attack of the
truth of Scripture by saying, "To know Christ, who is Himself
'the Truth' (John 14:6), we gladly turn to the teaching of 'the
Church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth'
(1 Timothy 3:15). After all, it was the Holy Spirit's preaching
through the Catholic Church that first told the world about the
good news of Christ's coming. And it is the Holy Spirit's
teaching through the Catholic Church that can keep us safely in
the truth about His coming again." (Ibid., p. 23.)
The author's first chapter is an
out-and-out attack on the idea of being "Left Behind." He calls
it, "The puzzling popularity of an odd idea." He discusses Tim
LaHaye's "Left Behind" series as following, "Breaking new ground
in the religious publishing world, this author's vision of the
end of history has created a multimillion-dollar apocalyptic
industry...What exactly has Jesus to do with this startling
story line? Why in the world would He want to make people
disappear and throw the human race into chaos? ... Once they are
gone, the Devil will be free to take control of the world
through his puppet, the Antichrist. Gross horrors will accompany
this diabolical man's wicked reign." (Ibid., p. 27.)
How can this author that was
gloriously saved, and the evidence points to a real experience,
become so totally determined to destroy some of the greatest
truth in Holy Scripture. It was Jesus who said, "Let not your
heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me. In my
Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would
have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and
prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto
myself; that where I am, there ye may be also." (John 14:1-3)
With that great promise from Jesus
Christ in mind, let's listen to Thigpen's reason to attack our
glorious hope. "The rapture doctrine is dangerous in yet a third
way: It is often tied to a larger, complex body of religious
teachings that are explicitly anti-Catholic. As we will see in
chapter seven, when fundamentalist authors such as LaHaye and
Jenkins write nonfiction books to explain the theology behind
their novels, they make it clear that they believe the Catholic
Church is a creation of the Devil and will be a tool of the
Antichrist. They go so far as to associate the Vatican with the
bloodthirsty 'whore of Babylon' pictured in the book of
Revelation, who drinks the blood of the Christian martyrs in the
last days of the world (see Revelation 17:1 - 18:24)." (Ibid.,
p. 35.)
To add to this statement Thigpen
stated, "Catholics who read the 'Left Behind' books or see the
movie are thus at risk of being deceived into thinking that the
very Church Jesus Christ founded on St. Peter and through the
other Apostles is actually a counterfeit church. Drawn into
reading other books or attending religious meetings that use
these spiritual scare tactics, they may not be prepared with an
adequate defense against such high-pressure fundamentalist
propaganda." (Ibid., pp. 35-36.)
I believe we are getting the
picture. The debate is not about the Bible or what Scripture
teaches, but the endangering of the Catholic Church. There is no
doubt for a Bible-believing person but that any doctrine that
anyone teaches contrary to the plain truth of the infallible
Word of God is wrong. The Catholic Church must attack and
destroy any idea that confronts their established institution.
They cannot create their One World Religion unless they can
control the way the people think. Whenever Bible believers begin
to make an impact, they always come out fighting. These books
against the Rapture are wonderful evidence that truth is making
an impact.
The second book that we must discuss
is entitled, Rapture: The End-Times Error That Leaves the Bible
Behind. It is written by David B. Currie. He is also a former
Bible believer who was raised to believe in the Rapture. He and
Paul Thigpen have the kind of understanding of Biblical truth to
make them well prepared to pick at every point. No person is
more dangerous to truth than that person that knows it but turns
from it. The Bible makes it plain that when Satan is defeated in
someone's life, he returns looking for an opportunity to
reestablish his control. If that life returns to its former
empty state, the demon returns with additional demons and the
latter state of that person is worse than their former
condition. These men are perfect examples.
In the preface of his book on the
Rapture, which was written for the Catholic Church, Mr. Currie
stated the following, "My own experience cannot help but
influence this book. I was raised in a devout Protestant home,
the only son of a Fundamentalist pastor. Many of the leaders of
the "pre-mill, pre-trib" movement were close family friends. I
attended Trinity College and Trinity Evangelical Divinity School
in Deerfield, Illinois. While still a believer in a
pretribulation rapture, I team-taught a college class on
prophecy and preached it from many pulpits. Although I had no
natural inclination toward Catholicism, I finally reconciled
with the Church in my forties. The rationale behind that
lifechanging decision can be found in my book, Born
Fundamentalist, Born Again Catholic." (Rapture: The End-Times
Error That Leaves the Bible Behind, by David B. Currie,
published by Sophia Institute Press, p. XV.)
What is perfectly evident in this
book as well as The Rapture Trap is that the difference is based
almost totally on the skewed teachings of Catholicism. I do not
know whether these personalities changed their views of the
Rapture before they converted to the Catholic Church or after,
but I strongly believe it was before. The loss of the literal
Biblical interpretation of the End Times sets a person on a sea
of change. The church denomination, where I spent over forty
years, has, for the most part, left the literal and
authoritative sense of Biblical interpretation and, in the
process, has changed radically. There is a very strong
development in that church hierarchy of a growing acceptance of
the Roman Catholic Church. Recently, a leader of that
denomination was invited as a guest to a celebration at the
Vatican and this was reported, along with a picture, in their
official publication. That would have caused a revolt twenty
years ago.
Let me simply give a few quotes in
the order of development from Mr. Currie's book.
"Left Behind author Tim LaHaye wants
to convince America that the rapture 'could be any time: today,
tomorrow, next week' (CT), while protecting his flanks with the
'rolling end of the world' strategy. He will not compromise on
the fact that we are in the final generation." (Ibid., p. 21.)
"Anything touching on Jerusalem in
Israel or Babylon in Iraq strikes a raw nerve with them."
(Ibid., p. 23.)
"A second problem with
premillennialist has to do with their vision of the Kingdom of
God. Is it spiritual or physical? The premillennialist would
claim it must be a corporeal reign of Christ here on earth.
Critics would counter that this completely misunderstands the
message of the major prophets of the Old Testament (Isaiah,
Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel), not to mention the message of
the entire New Testament." (Ibid., p. 47.)
"The third view, amillennialism, is
the one held by the vast majority of Christians, whether
Catholic, Orthodox, or Protestant. It is the only acceptable
option for the Protestant who claims to stand in the tradition
of Luther or Calvin and for the Catholic who seeks to remain
faithful to the teaching of the Church." (Ibid., pp. 48-49.)
"While the Catholic appeals to
Scripture, Tradition, and the teaching authority, or Magisterium,
of the Church to guide his beliefs, rapturists claim to rely
exclusively on the ostensibly clear and self-interpreting text
of the Bible. So it is fair to ask whether the rapturist belief
system is the best way to understand the relevant Scripture
passages, considered apart from other authoritative voices. Of
course, as Catholics, we would say this approach removes two
legs of the three-legged stool of truth. But discounting for our
purposes Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium, can the rapture
theory really do justice to what the Bible teaches?" (Ibid., p.
51.)
"The Book of Daniel lays the
foundation for the entire time framework of rapturist theology."
(Ibid., p. 79.)
"In fact, this gap does great
violence to the text, to the fundamental message of the vision -
all for the purpose of protecting rapturists from the idea that
the Catholic Church might have to be examined as a possible
candidate for the present-day Kingdom of Heaven." (Ibid., p.
82.)
On and on this author espouses the
doctrines and teachings of the church he has embraced. When you
couple his support of the Mass and the literal
transubstantiation of the bread and wine into the substance of
His body, with the Marian message, the infallibility of the
words of the pope, purgatory, etc., only demonic deception could
lead souls to such depths of untruth.
After both of these books attack
Bible believers because there have been so many false claims,
false prophecies, and false prophets; they describe the
situation in their own Catholic ranks to be equally flooded with
false alarms. Listen to author Thigpen speak to this issue. "To
complicate the matter even further, contemporary 'messengers'
have sprung up and multiplied as fast as wild mushrooms, and
some of them may be just as poisonous. Their messages sometimes
agree with one another, sometimes not. Meanwhile, anyone who
wants to stay up on the latest alleged locutions has to invest
considerable time reading through the stacks of visionary emails
that fly around the world daily via the Internet.
"A number of these messengers call
for concrete, immediate actions from their listeners. Some
insist, for example, that Catholics must procure a supply of
blessed candles (a few sources even dictate that they must be
beeswax candles), because only these will be capable of
providing light in homes during the 'three days of darkness.'
Others call for the creation of hidden sites of refuge, well
stocked for survival, to be used soon when the great persecution
of the Church arrives. Still others urge the faithful to move
away from coastal areas, because the coming comet will cause
tidal waves that will wipe out the populations of coastlines
around the world." (The Rapture Trap, by Paul Thigpen, Ph.D.
Published by Ascension Press, p. 227.)
After warning of the dangers from
Catholic mystics, Thigpen states, "Even so, we certainly do not
want to miss out on any extra graces our Lord may want to give
us through private revelations. How much poorer we would be if
our Lord had never asked St. Margaret Mary Alacoque to spread
devotion to His Sacred Heart! How many souls have been drawn to
God because that revelation has spurred them to make use of the
more ordinary means of grace! If God has truly spoken, and His
words have meaning - perhaps even urgency - for us, we are wise
to want to hear and obey them." (Ibid., p. 82.)
Conclusion
The Rapture of the Saints and the Pre-Tribulation doctrines of
Scripture have never been so attacked in church history. This of
itself is prophetic. By Apostle Peter, the Holy Ghost said that
men would say, "Where is the promise of his coming? for since
the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from
the beginning of the creation." "The Lord is not slack
concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is
longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish,
but that all should come to repentance." (II Peter 3:4, 9)
This vicious attack on the Rapture
by the largest religious organization in the world, the very
church with much to lose if you believe the truth, is prophetic
of where we are in final history. Man cannot set the hour
because the Father alone knows the time. Our joy is to watch,
occupy, be busy for His Kingdom on earth, and be ready. In a
moment that you think not, He may well return. |